When ServiceNow Stalls

ServiceNow is often introduced with a clear ambition: to create flow, transparency, and control across complex organizations. The expectations are high, and rightly so. The platform is powerful and flexible. Yet in many organizations I work with, that promise slowly fades after go-live.

Instead of flow, teams experience friction. Instead of clarity, they see complexity. ServiceNow is there, but it is not delivering what leadership expected. The platform has not failed, but something along the way has.

Customization as a comfort trap

One of the most common reasons is over-customization. It usually starts with good intentions. Every team has “special requirements.” Every exception feels justified. Over time, the platform bends further and further away from standard behavior.

What happens next is predictable. Upgrades become risky. New features are ignored. Knowledge is locked into a few individuals. ServiceNow becomes expensive to maintain and difficult to evolve. What once felt tailored now feels fragile.

Processes frozen in time

Another issue I see frequently is that ServiceNow ends up reflecting outdated processes. The platform is implemented to mirror how work was done years ago, rather than how it should be done going forward. Automation is added on top of inefficiency instead of replacing it.

This creates a subtle but serious problem. Teams blame the tool for being slow or clunky, when in reality it is faithfully executing poorly designed workflows. Without continuous process ownership, ServiceNow becomes a digital museum of old ways of working.

The ownership gap

Many organizations underestimate how much ownership ServiceNow requires after implementation. Responsibility is often split between IT, process owners, and external partners, with no single party accountable for end-to-end outcomes.

When ownership is unclear, decisions are delayed. Backlogs grow. Small improvements never get prioritized. The platform stagnates, not because no one cares, but because no one is clearly empowered to move it forward.

From implementation to product thinking

The organizations that succeed with ServiceNow tend to make a clear mental shift. They stop treating it as a one-time implementation and start treating it as a product. That means clear roadmaps, continuous feedback, and regular prioritization based on business impact.

This shift changes conversations. Instead of asking “Can ServiceNow do this?”, teams ask “Should we do this, and why?” The platform becomes a means to improve outcomes, not a destination in itself. 

Restoring momentum

Getting ServiceNow back on track rarely requires a full restart. More often, it requires honest assessment. What customizations are truly necessary? Which processes should be redesigned rather than automated? Who owns the platform’s evolution?

When those questions are addressed, progress tends to accelerate surprisingly fast. Not because the technology changed, but because the way it is governed did.

Följ Jaikumar på LinkedIn för fler insikter inom området.